Mexico sues gun makers over flow of arms from US to Mexico

“This flood is not a natural phenomenon or an inevitable consequence of the gun business or of U.S. gun laws. It is the foreseeable result of the Defendants’ deliberate actions and business practices,” the grievance reads.

Major manufacturers Smith & Wesson, Colt and Glock are among the many almost dozen defendants named within the go well with.

The firms didn’t reply instantly to CNN’s request for remark.

DOJ creates gun trafficking strike forces in five cities to crack down on sources of firearm-related crime

The grievance was filed in a US Federal Court in Boston, and goals “to put an end to the massive damage that the Defendants cause by actively facilitating the unlawful trafficking of their guns to drug cartels and other criminals in Mexico,” the grievance reads.

Mexico alleges that the defendants design, market, distribute and promote weapons in ways in which routinely arm drug cartels in Mexico, “Defendants use reckless and corrupt gun dealers and dangerous and illegal sales practices that the cartels rely on to get their guns.”

“Defendants design these guns to be easily modified to fire automatically and to be readily transferable on the criminal market in Mexico,” the go well with continued.

From 1999 to 2004, homicides in Mexico have been declining however then elevated dramatically starting in 2004, “exactly contemporaneously with Defendants’ increased production, distribution, and marketing of their military-grade weapon,” the go well with reads.

Foreign Ministry Marcelo Ebrard mentioned throughout a convention on Wednesday that after two years of labor, Mexico filed the grievance with the objective of “the defendants companies compensate the Mexican government for the damages caused by their negligent practices, the amount of this demand will be determined in the trial.”

“We are going to litigate it with all seriousness, and we are going to win the trial, and we’re going to drastically reduce the illicit arms trade to Mexico, which cannot remain unpunished to those who produce, promote and encourage this traffic from the United States,” Ebrard mentioned.

Central America's migration problem isn't going away anytime soon

He added that the defendants ought to develop and implement cheap requirements to observe and, when applicable, self-discipline their distributors “because companies know it, they argue that after selling and marketing they no longer have the responsibility, but they do,” he continued.

“This demand doesn’t replace other efforts that must be made, Mexico has to do more and better to control its border, in fact, we have to think of another type of supervision of the borders against weapons, it does not replace, but it’s essential, If we don’t make a complaint of this nature and we don’t win it, they will not understand, they will continue to do the same, and we will continue to have deaths every day in our country.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *